logbn = logan / logab
As long as we follow the pattern of the formula, you can make it workable on any base you choose.
given y = log2 3
can be rewritten as:
y = log10 3 / log10 2
How to we evaluate? We can either use our calculator and get y~ 1.585 . . .
Or, we can use logs. (No kidding, eh!)
y = log2 3
change to an exponential expression.
2^y = 3
then we apply the def of logs: log(2^y) = log3
y = log10(3) / log10(2)

Solving exponential equation.
Solve:
2(3^x) = 5
CAVEAT! (A latin word that means "warning" or "beware"):
log (x + 3) != (not equal to) logx + log3
instead, it becomes:
log(2(3^x)) = log5
log2 + log3^x = log5
log2 + x * log3 = log5
x * log3 = log5 - log2
x = log5 - log2 / log3 (at this point, we cannot continue without a calculator)
x = .8340437671
to check out answer: 2 * 3 ^ .8340437671 = 5
We just solved our very first exponential equation!

Let's solve another one:
19^(x - 5) = 3^(x+2)
(Note: Our reason for doing the log is to bring the exponents down.)
log 19 ^ (x - 5) = log 3^(x+2)
x * log19 - 5 * log19 = x * log3 + 2 * log 3
(x - 5) * log 19 = (x + 2) * log 3
x * log19 - 5 * log19 = x * log3 + 2 * log3
x * (log19 - log3) = 2 * log3 + 5 * log19
x = 2 * log3 + 5 * log19 / (log19 - log3) (now we use our calculator)
x ~ 9.166

log2 (x - 2) + log2(x) = log23
log2(x - 2)(x) = log23
x - 2(x) = 3 (we can remove the logs since they have the same base)
x ^ 2 - 2x - 3
(x + 1)(x - 3) = 0
x = -1, x = 3
STOP!
x = -1 doesn't solve the equation.
x = 3 works, though

log5(3x + 1) + log5(x - 3) = 3
log5[(3x+1)(x-3)] = 3
(use definition of logs:
5 ^ 3 = (3x + 1)(x - 3)
logab = n
a^n = b)
125 = 3x^2 - 8x -3
0 = 3x^2 - 8x - 128
(384: 16 and 24 as factors)
0 = 3x^2 - 24x + 16x - 128
0 = 3x(x-8) + 16(x-8)
0 = (3x + 16) (x - 8)
3x + 16 = 0, x - 8 = 0
x = -16/3 and x = 8
check for error:
- 16 /3 isn't a solution because after we plug it in, there is no value that 5 ^x that would be equal to a negative argument.

that cop looks like he's been drinking paint thinner
ReplyDelete